Monday, November 25, 2013

The Iran historic mistake



11/23/2013

MARKS THE DAY THAT, THE UNITED STATES MADE A DEAL WITH IRAN AND STOPPED BACKING ISRAEL. IT IS THE DAY THAT SOME WILL REMEMBER AS THE DAY THAT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CHANGED ITS COURSE AND STARTED GOING DOWN THE WRONG WAY PATCH. WHICH IT IS UNDENIABLY WHAT HAPPENED HERE. THE PEACE TIME MAY ONLY BE FOR ANOTHER 6 MONTHS AND IF ISRAEL OR IRAN ATTACK EACH OTHER EXPECT WORLD WAR 3. THIS TIMING AND MEANING MUST BE FOUND SOMEWHERE AND IT MUST HAVE SOME PURPOSE WELL IM HERE TO TELL YOU IT DOES, IN HOLY SCRIPTURES, IN THE BOOK OF REVELATIONS THE TEXT SAYS THAT BABYLON WILL MAKE ISRAEL A 7 YEAR DEAL AND FROM THEN ON THE WORLD WILL ONLY SPIN FOR 7 MORE YEARS, WELL LADYS AND GENTLEMEN THAT DEAL IS KNOCKING ON OUR DOOR STEP AND THESE TIMES ARE CALLED THE END TIMES IN WHICH MOST CHRISTIANS BELIEVE THAT WHEN THIS TIME STRICKES UPON US GOD WILL COME BACK AND SAVE THEM (RAPTURE) WHICH YES OF COURSE HE WILL HE PROMISED IT IN HIS SCRIPTURE BUT THERE IS SOMETHING THAT YOU NEED TO DO IF YOU ARE NOT SAVED I HIGHLY SUGGEST YOU THINK ABOUT GETTING SAVED AND MAKING JESUS CHRIST YOUR LORD AND SAVIOR ( PRAYER AT BOTTOM IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO).



THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE, HERE IS THE TRUTH: OBAMA IS A MUSLIM AND THAT IS WHY HE IS WORKING WITH IRAN, FIRST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY TO DO SUCH, AND AS HE HAS STATED HE WANTS TO BRING A NEW WORLD ORDER INTO PLAY, NOT GOOD NOT GOOD AT ALL.



HERE IS THE INFO ON WHAT DEAL WAS STRUCK WITH IRAN.

 Iran has struck a landmark deal with the United States and five world powers to freeze important parts of its nuclear programme. In return, Iran will get limited relief on some economic sanctions.

The breakthrough came during talks in Geneva, and follows a series of high level face-to-face talks between the US and Iran over the past year.

The agreement is being hailed as the most significant development between Washington and Tehran in more than 30 years.
I think is a win-win for both sides. They don't explicitly acknowledge Iran's right to enrich nuclear material, but in fact they can do it .... On the other hand it buys more time to prevent them from having a nuclear breakout … and the most important thing is … the beginning of a normalisation of relations between the United States and Iran.
Larry Korb, a former assistant US secretary of defence
It is intended to be a first step towards a more comprehensive nuclear pact, to be completed in six months.

Under the deal, Iran has committed to halt uranium enrichment above five percent, limit existing stockpiles of enriched uranium, stop further development of the Arak reactor, and allow increased inspections of its nuclear sites.
In return, the six world powers that make up the so-called P5+1 - the US, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany - will provide limited relief of some trade sanctions, said to be worth as much as $7bn.

There will be no new sanctions for six months, and Iran will be granted access to some frozen accounts overseas.

The main sanctions on oil, banking and financial systems will remain in place, and all sanctions will be reinstated if Iran violates the terms of this agreement, with the possibility of more sanctions being imposed.
"Today, diplomacy opened up a new path toward a world that is more secure, a future in which we can verify that Iran's nuclear programme is peaceful and that it cannot build a nuclear weapon. While today's announcement is just a first step, it achieves a great deal. For the first time in nearly a decade, we have halted the progress of the Iranian nuclear programme," Barack Obama, the US president, said.
Iran's president, Hassan Rouhani, also welcomed the deal, saying his country had finally won the respect it deserves: "The acknowledgement by world powers concerning this right and the elimination of obstacles in the face of the Iranian nation is of great value. The second achievement is the enrichment right by the Iranian nation on Iranian soil. Whatever the interpretation, this right has been explicitly stipulated by this agreement, stressing that Iran will go on with its enrichment programme."
But Israel condemned the deal, accusing Iran of "deception and self-delusion".
 "What was achieved in Geneva is not an historic agreement; it is an historic mistake. Today the world has become a much more dangerous place because the most dangerous regime in the world has taken a significant step toward attaining the most dangerous weapon in the world," Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu told his cabinet.
Can this agreement be considered the greatest foreign policy achievement of the Obama administration? And is this the first step towards resolving a dangerous decade-old standoff?
To discuss this, Inside Story, with presenter Adrian Finighan, is joined by guests: Mohammad Marandi, a political analyst and professor at the University of Tehran; Gerald Steinberg, a professor of political science at Bar-Ilan University and a former Israeli delegate to the International Atomic Energy Agency academic conferences; and Larry Korb, a senior fellow at the Centre for American progress and former assistant US secretary of defence.
"This is an agreement that was reached between the five permanents members of the Security Council plus Germany and Iran. Israel is not at the table and, in fact, Israel is never at the table because no Iranian official will ever sit at the same table with Israel .... Israelis do not see this agreement as providing a framework which will stop Iran. We have six months to see substance, but it seems to be very unlikely, particularly as the sanctions are being reduced without something serious from Iran in return for that."
Gerald Steinberg, a professor of political science at Bar-llan University

THE JERUSALEM POST

Nuclear accord struck in Geneva takes high, unnecessary risks; rests on shaky foundations that could possibly lead to collapse of sanctions regime; Iran can be expected to spend next 6 month trying to divide int'l powers.

Geneva nuclear talks, November 24, 2013.
Geneva nuclear talks, November 24, 2013. Photo: REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
At first glance, the deal struck by Iran and the international community in Geneva is merely a first step toward a final arrangement, which, in theory, can force Iran to move back from the nuclear brink.
The Geneva deal appears to carry some welcome amendments, such as a cessation of Iranian work at the Arak heavy water reactor, the introduction of daily IAEA inspections at Iranian nuclear sites, and the neutralization of Iran’s stockpile of 20-percent enriched uranium.
But upon closer inspection, the deal, though better than the first draft floated this month, takes high and unnecessary risks, and rests on shaky foundations that might just end up collapsing, bringing international sanctions down with them.
The White House has provided assurances that the few sanctions eased in this deal can be restored, and vowed to keep the pressure on Iran, presenting the arrangement as a risk-free, six-month test of Iran’s true intentions.
But if the next round of diplomacy hits an impasse, it is far from certain that the international community or the US will rush to recognize the failure, or respond by adding more sanctions against Iran.
The biting sanctions that pushed Iranians to vote for President Hassan Rouhani, and which convinced Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to negotiate more seriously, rest on an international coalition, itself made up of a wide range of countries that have diverging strategic, political and economic interests.
Iran can be expected to spend the next six months trying to divide this shaky coalition, and, aided by the lifting of some sanctions, will seek to whet the appetite of firms from around the world, to lure them back to do valuable business with it in the future.
Today it remains unclear how the White House would respond if the second stage of diplomacy with Iran fails. The US’s military deterrence is deflated, and the Obama administration’s credibility is too badly damaged in the region to cause either Riyadh or Jerusalem to trust the White House’s assurances.
A lack of firm international resolve in responding to failed talks would spell the beginning of the end of the sanctions regime, and leave Iran with its nuclear program intact.
The sanctions might crumble, but Iran would be left with all of its centrifuges in place, and an international recognition of its “right” to produce low-enriched uranium, which it obtained through Sunday’s Geneva deal.
In Jerusalem, there is one fundamental formula that trumps all others when it comes to Iran. If faced with two choices, either accepting an Iran with the bomb, or bombing Iran, Israel will always choose the latter.
A nuclear Iran, together with Iran’s trans-national terrorism and proxy networks, and the regional arms race that will surely follow, will be many times more dangerous to Israel’s well-being than an attack on Iranian nuclear sites
 LINK
JPOST


AS I SAID BEFORE THE TIME IS GETTING CLOSER AND CLOSER AND I HIGHLY SUGGEST YOU ACCEPT THE LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST INTO YOUR HEART AND MIND BY SAYING THIS PRAYER ITS THE FIRST STEP IN A LONG AND VICTORIOUS JOURNEY

-FATHER IN HEAVEN I HAVE COME TO YOU AS A SINNER AND TODAY AND I PRAY THAT I MAY ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST INTO MY HEART AND MIND SO I MAY BE SAVED FROM THE SNARES OF THE DEVIL, I ASK LORD THAT YOU PLEASE FORGIVE ME OF MY SINS AND WASH ME AWAY THROUGH SPIRIT THAT I MAY BECOME APART OF THE WINNING TEAM. I HAVE COME TO BELIEVE THAT JESUS CHRIST DIED ON THE CROSS FOR MY SINS AND THAT YOU ROSE HIM UP FROM THE DEAD SO I COULD HAVE A PLACE IN HEAVEN, AND I ASK THAT YOU PLEASE GUIDE ME TO THE NEXT STEP, PLEASE LORD SHOW ME THE WAY, AND WALK WITH ME IN THESE DAYS TO COME, I KNOW THAT I HAVE DONE WRONG AND I ASK THAT YOU SAVE ME FROM MYSELF; BECAUSE I HAVE NOW ACCEPTED JESUS CHRIST AS MY LORD, MY SAVIOR, MY GOD, AND MY UNFAILING FRIEND.
THANK YOU FATHER
IN JESUS NAME AMEN

No comments:

Post a Comment